Skip to content
  • Library
  • Upcoming
  • Resources
  • About
  • Library
  • Upcoming
  • Resources
  • About
BECOME A MEMBER
LOGIN
MY ACCOUNT
LOGOUT
$0.00 0 Cart

NLRB Determines that Overbroad Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Severance Agreements are Unlawful

  • By Kerri Beatty

On February 21, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a decision holding that an employer violates Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) when it offers a severance agreement containing provisions that would restrict employees’ exercise of their rights under Section 7 of the Act. 

In McLaren Macomb, the employer furloughed 11 employees and presented each of them with a

“Severance Agreement, Waiver and Release” that offered to pay severance amounts to each furloughed employee if they signed the agreement.  Theconfidentiality provision stated that the terms of the severance agreement were confidential and must not be disclosed to anyone with few exceptions. The non-disparagement provision barred the employees from making statements to anyone that could disparage or harm the image of the employer or its officers, directors, employees.  The NLRB found that these provisions limited employees’ ability to discuss their wages, hours, and working conditions with other employees, prevent employees from assisting other employees seeking assistance, and hinder employees themselves from seeking assistance from the NLRB, unions, and other outside organizations. Such agreements, according to the Board, have a reasonable tendency to restrain, coerce, or interfere with employees’ rights under the NLRA.

The Board determined that the mere inclusion of such provisions in a severance agreement is unlawful because they have a deterrent and chilling effect on worker’s rights. Pursuant to the NLRB’s decision, a severance agreement will be deemed unlawful if it precludes an employee from assisting coworkers with workplace issues concerning their employer, and from communicating with others, including a union and the Board, about their employment.  Notably, the decision applies only to employees covered by the NLRA, which means that supervisory and managerial employees, as well as independent contractors, would generally be excluded.

The NLRB General Counsel is expected to release additional guidance regarding the recent decision.  In the meantime, employers should ensure that confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in their severance agreements are narrowly tailored to respect to the rights afforded to employees under the NLRA.  Should you have any questions or need assistance, please contact Ali Law Group.

#showonalg

PrevPreviousNew York State Pay Transparency Law Proposed Amendments
NextHRtelligence Ribbon Cutting on March 21stNext

This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

Picture of Kerri Beatty

Kerri Beatty

Content Specialist Kerri is a practicing attorney with invaluable skills and a strong base of knowledge in many areas of law gained both serving clients and during her previous experiences as an intern for a Federal District Court Judge and as an editor of the Law Review during law school.

Connect

Contact Us

Phone: (631) 423-3440 [email protected]

Newsletter Sign Up

                    
                    
      
            
            
      

Follow Us

Linkedin

©2025 HRtelligence. All Rights Reserved.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.