Skip to content
  • Library
  • Upcoming
  • Resources
  • About
  • Library
  • Upcoming
  • Resources
  • About
BECOME A MEMBER
LOGIN
MY ACCOUNT
LOGOUT
$0.00 0 Cart

Proposed Rules Extend Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance

  • By Kerri Beatty

Submitted by Ali Law Group PC on April 2, 2018

In response to President Trump’s October 2017 Executive Order, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury issued a proposed rule to amend the definition of short-term, limited duration insurance. The rule proposes to expand the availability of short-term, limited-duration health insurance by allowing consumers to buy plans providing coverage for any period of less than 12 months, rather than the current maximum period of less than three months.

Short-term, limited duration insurance is a type of health insurance coverage designed to fill temporary gaps in coverage that may occur when an individual transitions from one plan or coverage to another. According to the fact sheet presented by the Departments, individuals and families who would benefit from the new policy may include those: 

  • who are between jobs or other sources of coverage
  • who find ACA coverage too expensive or have seen their health insurance choices diminish; and
  • whose doctors are not in network under ACA plans.

Longer limited-duration plans would also reduce the risk of a gap in coverage for people with short-term coverage who become seriously ill while covered. Under current rules, a person who becomes ill would likely not qualify for another plan less than three months in duration because of the illness and would then need to wait without coverage until the next year to gain coverage in the individual market. 

The proposed rule, if finalized, will provide additional options to those who cannot afford to pay the costs of soaring healthcare premiums or do not have access to healthcare choices that meet their needs under current law.

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • google+
  • pinterest
PrevPreviousSupreme Court Holds that Employers Must Interpret Collective Bargaining Agreements in Accordance with “Ordinary Contract Principles”
NextThe IRS Requests Comments on Scope of Determination Letter Program for Individually Designed PlansNext

This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

Picture of Kerri Beatty

Kerri Beatty

Content Specialist Kerri is a practicing attorney with invaluable skills and a strong base of knowledge in many areas of law gained both serving clients and during her previous experiences as an intern for a Federal District Court Judge and as an editor of the Law Review during law school.

Connect

Contact Us

Phone: (631) 423-3440 [email protected]

Newsletter Sign Up

                    
                    
      
            
            
      

Follow Us

Linkedin

©2025 HRtelligence. All Rights Reserved.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.